Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’ and Golding’s ‘Lord of the Flies’ Essay

In doing this I entrust explore some of the key points in twain(prenominal) novels. For example they both criticise the period of time they are living in. For Golding it is after the warrant World War and he is addressing that war could break out again. Proving this is in the first chapter we hear we was attacked This shows that mankind would attack children in a passenger plane. Whereas Conrad is living in the late Victorian era where Europe has pierce imperialism on Africa and has exploited the natives into slavery. Evidence of this is the chain-gangs.Firstly I am freeing to look at how both of the novels in some show a sort of journey into the tender mind. In ecclesiastic of the Flies it is where the children bewilder from the good side of the island to the bad side. This starts with diddly saying Bollocks to the rules This flat showed the breakdown in society. This started possibly not the journey of the children from good to bad, but it is a journey that the island give births from good to bad. It starts with knucklebones saying that his choir shall be hunters.This begins the journey. The island starts to get darker and the children start to show the darkness of the serviceman heart. With hunters that basis constitute qualities linked with it that turns people into mere animals with only one thing on the mindkilling. This is showed by how when rogue, Simon and Ralph find the candle buds, Jack acts aggressive with them Jack slashed one of them open with his knife and its scent spilled over them. He didnt just cut them open he slashed them. He again has killing on his mind with we cant consume them. It is not only Jack that has taken this journey into evil. Jacks phratry are heard to be chanting incessantly Kill the fauna Cut his throat Spill his bloodSo Goldings depiction of a journey into the human mind addresses the obsession of killing. Conrad has a convertible approach, but instead of killing he uses madness. Evidence that this is a third estate thing in the Congo is when Marlow pays a visit to the Doctor. The Doctor was because with a certain eagerness asked me whether he could measure my head Marlow allow him, and asked the Doctor whether he measured the peoples heads when they come back too? immediately the Doctor says something somewhat funny Oh, I never see themthe changes take place inside you know So the Doctor implies that people go mad out thither and never come back.The characters in the dickens novels sort of follow the alike(p) lines. I receive grouped the principal(prenominal) four characters from the two novels and prepare put them in to two pairs- Marlow and Ralph and Jack and Mr Kurtz. Firstly, with Marlow and Ralph they start off as good people but they both make mistakes. For Ralph it was ultimately letting the group vote on whether there were ghosts or not. He did not need to let the vote go. What was strange was the way in that he asked the question Who thinks that there may be ghosts? That question seems to lead everyone into saying that there are ghosts. He promptly lost power. He should have asked, Who thinks that there are no ghosts? This would have led everyone into voting for this. Marlow made the main mistake in existence led into Kurtzs charisma. He had stated his dislike of the ivory be kept, but when he met Kurtz you hear him say, I was fascinatedJack and Kurtz were alike in that they were evil. I have already examined the way in that Jack is evil, as he instigated the break down in the society on the island. He also had a band of bloodthirsty hunters. Kurtz is evil in the way that he brought in more ivory than all the another(prenominal) stations put together but he never returned it. aspect at the viewpoint of the two novels I find that are in two different ways to address the nature of the novels. Heart of nighttime has Marlows viewpoint. I believe that this was done so that we could be in line with his thoughts and feelings. This mak es us understand more active the darkness of the human heart. Whereas ecclesiastic of the Flies has a narrator. We dont get the same inside intelligence as with Marlow, but we get some viewpoints much(prenominal) as Ralph wept for the end of innocenceHaving a narrator helps us to have focused on Ralph on a curve of learning. Simon is viewed differently as his mind is open to us. For example when he encounters the Lord of the Flies, the words that the Lord of the Flies are saying is merely Simon speaking to himself. Golding is piece of writing about Simon in this way so that he can express who the animate being actually is. Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt you knew didnt you? Im part of you? We instantly now start to understand that something as bad as the Beast has been made up by the human heart.The setting that Conrad uses is firstly the Thames and then he compares it with Congo. He uses the fact that the Thames leads into the biggest, and the greatest, town on earth. Then the journey down the Congo is a bridle-path to evil and darkness. The things Marlow see such as the chain gangs. Black shapes crouched, bring downattitudes of pain, abandonment, and despair They were dying very slowly-it was very clearIn Lord of the Flies Ralph is Adam in Garden of Eden as he has an instinctual relationship with his surroundings, but his goodness gradually fades as he is tempted by evil. The apple in the Garden of Eden is the bad side of the island (the castle area). This is proved by the fact that that was where Piggy was killed his head opened and mash came out and turned red.Both novels address the darkness of the human heart. I believe that they are both very similar. Conrad and Golding both use remnant as their tool of evil. In Heart of Darkness it is the natives of Africa that are exploited and flogged until they die. In Lord of the Flies Golding has used the fact that even children would wrap up each other if they were in charge of s ociety.Both of the texts are fables. The two authors criticise what is happening or what could happen in their period of time. Conrad didnt like what was happening in Africa in the late nineteenth century. Golding was writing what could happen if another war broke out. They may both go to the extremes to condemn society, but with the violence of the everyday world and the overall greed, anything can happen.