Concealed Carry Laws Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Concealed Carry Laws - Essay ExampleSub-point 1 Crime rates be lower in states with obscure gun carry laws. Sub-point 2 Crime rates have non worsened in states with out of sight gun carry laws. Main Point 2 Banning firearms does non reduce crimes. Sub-point 1 No positive association between gun ownership and violence. Sub-point 2 Studies do not show that gun control laws have reduced crimes. Main Point 3 chase country history and experience show allowing hide weapons carry does not make societies less peaceful. Sub-point 1 Among countries, gun control laws are not associated with peace. Sub-point 2 Gun ownership and murder rates are not correlated across countries. Conclusion Based on evidence, there is good basis not to reverse the gains American society has made in allowing the carry of concealed weapons for Americans to protect themselves. The advances in concealed weapons laws have been beneficial and not dangerous for America. Concealed weapon carry laws Are they benefici al or dangerous for America? Introduction A center known for its being vocal against laws allowing the carry of concealed weapons, the violence Policy middle, has pointed out that the gun lobbys priority has been establishing and expanding state laws that allow the carrying of concealed handguns by private citizens (2009, p. 3). According to the center (2009, p. ... The Violence Policy Center has been very concerned and determine three key data on why concealed weapons carry laws are dangerous for America. First, jibe to the Violence Policy Center (2009, p. 4), over the two-year period May 2007 through 2009, concealed handguns grant holders have slain seven law enforcement officers resulting in criminal charges or the suicide of the shooter. Second, again correspond to the Violence Policy Center (2009, p. 4), concealed handgun permit holders have slain at least 43 private citizens resulting in criminal charges or the suicide of the shooter. And, third, according to the Violen ce Policy Center (2009, p. 4), in six of the 30 incidents (20 percent), the concealed handgun permit holder killed himself, bringing the total sine qua non count to 56. The Violence Policy Centers concern for violence in America, particularly murders or homicide and suicide is certainly laudable. Indeed, it is the duty of todays generation to see to it that every citizen is out of scathes way. Indeed, it is an obligation of todays generation of Americans to keep society safe and peaceful. Unfortunately, however, the basis for the Violence Policy Centers concerns against the concealed weapons laws and the attribution the organization places on concealed weapons laws as prudent for the incidences of violence is anecdotal and unscientific. The Violence Policy Centers arguments are like arguments that because consulting a determine or being confined in a hospital have been associated with illness or ending then society must ban doctors and hospitals because many people have died wh en they have